NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hopkinson; R v Robertson [2022] NSWCCA 80 Hearing dates: 18 March 2022 Date of orders: 13 April 2022 Decision date: 13 April 2022 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Rothman J at [11]; Hamill J at [169] Decision: The Court dismisses the appeal in each case. Catchwords: CRIME – Crown appeal against sentence – joint enterprise murder of minor by juveniles – alleged error in applying standard non-parole period – alleged failure to apply statutory aggravating features – alleged manifest inadequacy – statutory aggravating features not to be applied formulaically – no error disclosed – not manifestly inadequate in light of respective roles and subjective circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 68A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 23, 44, 54A, 54B Cases Cited: Adzioski v R [2013] NSWCCA 69 BM v R [2019] NSWCCA 223 Borg v R [2019] NSWCCA 129 BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159 CMB v Attorney-General NSW (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Collector of Customs v Pressure Tankers Pty Ltd and Pozzolanic Enterprise Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280; [1993] FCA 456 Darcy v R [2019] NSWCCA 159 Director of Public Prosecutions v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Hayek v R [2016] NSWCCA 126 Hili & Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Hurmz v R [2017] NSWCCA 235 Kane v R [2021] NSWCCA 250 Kennedy v R [2016] NSWCCA 114 Leach v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 73; 183 A Crim R 1 Lowe v the Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 McKinley v R [2022] NSWCCA 14 Milat v R; Klein v R [2014] NSWCCA 29 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 MJ v R [2010] NSWCCA 52 Postiglione v the Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v Church [2012] NSWCCA 149 R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 R v LNT [2005] NSWCCA 307 R v Milat & Klein [2012] NSWSC 634 R v Robertson; R v Hopkinson [2021] NSWSC 861 Raad v R [2011] NSWCCA 138 Tassis v The Queen [2017] NSWCCA 143 Tepania v The Queen (2018) 275 A Crim R 233; [2018] NSWCCA 247 Veen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Wong v the Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (Applicant) Christopher Hopkinson (Respondent) Joel Robertson (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Hatfield (Crown) R Rodger (Respondent Hopkinson) N Adams SC with R Jankowski (Respondent Robertson)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate