NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kemal v R [2022] NSWCCA 83 Hearing dates: 1 April 2022 Date of orders: 27 April 2022 Decision date: 27 April 2022 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Adamson J [12] Bellew J at [13] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Where the applicant pleaded guilty to importing a border controlled drug concealed in the lining of a suitcase – Where the Crown specifically disavowed a case based on the applicant having actual knowledge of the drugs – Crown case put on the basis of recklessness – Where the effect of the applicant's evidence was that he had turned his mind to the possibility that he was importing drugs – Where the relevant legislation defined recklessness in terms of the existence of a substantial risk rather than a possibility – Where the sentencing judge made reference to the applicant's evidence when assessing his criminality and his level of recklessness – Whether that approach reflected the application of an incorrect test – Necessity to read the reasons for sentence as a whole – No error established – Leave to appeal granted – Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Ke v R [2021] NSWCCA 117 Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132; [1995] HCA Category: Principal judgment Parties: Konuk Kemal – Applicant Regina – Respondent Representation: Counsel: S Pararajasingham and E Beljic – Applicant G Mahony – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate