NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lewis v Doyle (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 447 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 27 April 2022 Decision date: 27 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: I order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs in the sum of $255,000.00. Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs – three offers of compromise served by plaintiff – where verdict exceeded all three offers - where first offer served three days after proceedings commenced – not unreasonable for defendant to have rejected offer – second offer served months after pleadings closed and following mediation – unreasonable for defendant to have rejected offer – plaintiff seeking gross sum costs order – where defendant had become bankrupt since proceedings commenced – where defendant had unnecessarily put the plaintiff to proof of matters that should not have been in issue – gross sum costs order made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 91 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Pt 52A r 6 Cases Cited: Bobb v Wombat Securities Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 863 Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No 26) [2014] NSWSC 1009 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Hamod v New South Wales (No 13) [2009] NSWSC 756 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213 Lewis v Doyle [2022] NSWSC 92 Miles v Doyle (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 1524 Young v Hones (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 499 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (No. 2) [2014] NSWCA 99 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Darren John Lewis (Plaintiff) Philip William Doyle (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: On the papers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate