NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Carter v Mehmet (No 3) [2022] NSWCA 64 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 21 April 2022 Decision date: 21 April 2022 Before: Meagher JA, Gleeson JA, Payne JA Decision: (1) Dismiss paragraphs 2 and 3 of the notice of motion dated 9 December 2021; (2) No order as to costs of paragraphs 2 and 3 of the notice of motion. Catchwords: COSTS — party/party — exceptions to general rule that costs follow the event — offer of compromise — where offer made to compromise claim and cross-claim — where no separate offer made in relation to appeal proceedings — circumstances in which it is appropriate to "otherwise order" Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 20.26, 36.16, 42.14, 42.15, 42.15A, 51.47, 51.48, 51.49 Cases Cited: Bartlett v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 2) (2016) 92 NSWLR 670; [2016] NSWCA 142 Bathurst Regional Council as Trustee for the Bathurst City Council Crown Reserves Reserve Trusts v Thompson (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 420 Carter v Mehmet [2021] NSWCA 286 Carter v Mehmet (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 333 Hutley v Cosco (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 335 Lewis Securities Ltd (in liq) v Carter (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 159 Mehmet v Carter [2017] NSWSC 1067 Mehmet v Carter [2018] NSWCA 305 Mendonca v Tonna (No 3) [2020] NSWCA 332 Regency Media Pty Ltd v AAV Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 368 Valmont Interiors Pty Ltd v Giorgio Armani Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] NSWCA 160 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Murray John Carter (First Appellant) The Wheel Resort Pty Ltd (Second Appellant) Cathscompany Pty Ltd (Third Appellant) Ian Mehmet t/as ATF Ian G Mehmet Testamentary Trust (First Respondent) Cameron Mehmet t/as ATF Cameron Mehmet Testamentary Trust (Second Respondent) Errol Mehmet t/as ATF Errol J Mehmet Testamentary Trust (Third Respondent) Cheers Aviation Pty Ltd t/as ATF KMCG Investment Trust (Fourth Respondent) Matthew Timothy Cheers (Fifth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Alexis SC, M Southwick (Appellants) DA Smallbone (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate