NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Chalabian (No. 13) [2022] NSWSC 470 Hearing dates: 5 April 2022 Date of orders: 6 April 2022 Decision date: 21 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: 1. The application to give a Mahmood direction concerning the fact that Reece Walsh was not called by the Crown as a witness at the trial is declined. 2. Subject to any further application by the parties, the directions given to the jury concerning alternative verdicts, including a "no compromise" direction, are to stand. Catchwords: CRIME – jury trial – trial for money laundering under s.400.3(1) Criminal Code (Cth) – defence application for Mahmood direction as a result of Crown not calling person to give evidence – consideration of relevant factors – Mahmood direction declined – directions given to jury concerning statutory alternative verdicts and "no compromise" direction – charged offence required "belief" that money or property was proceeds of crime – alternative offences involving "recklessness" or "negligence" – possible relevance of s.5.4(4) Criminal Code (Cth) containing extended definition of "recklessness" – consideration of appropriate directions to jury concerning alternative verdicts Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Code (Cth) Criminal Code (WA) Cases Cited: Abdallah v R [2016] NSWCCA 275 Ansari v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 299; [2010] HCA 18 Blackwell v R (2011) 81 NSWLR 119; [2011] NSWCCA 93 Bouch v R (2017) 80 MVR 85; [2017] VSCA 86 Country Care Group Pty Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2020] FCAFC 30; (2020) 387 ALR 225 Gilson v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 353; [1991] HCA 24 Humphreys v R [2020] NSWCCA 144 King v The Queen (2012) 245 CLR 588; [2012] HCA 24 LLW v R (2012) 35 VR 372; [2012] VSCA 54 Mahmood v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 397; [2008] HCA 1 Mourkakos v R [2018] VSCA 26 Pratten v R [2014] NSWCCA 117 R v Ansari (2007) 70 NSWLR 89; [2007] NSWCCA 204 R v Barrett (No. 3) [2021] NSWSC 543 R v Chalabian (No. 11) [2022] NSWSC 384 R v Chalabian (No. 12) [2022] NSWSC 432 R v Currie [2002] NSWCCA 126 R v Pureau (1990) 19 NSWLR 372 R v Saengsai-Or (2004) 61 NSWLR 135; [2004] NSWCCA 108 Simms v R (2004) 148 A Crim R 433; [2004] WASCA 237 Stanton v The Queen (2003) 77 ALJR 1151; [2003] HCA 29 Texts Cited: Criminal Trial Courts Bench Book, Judicial Commission of New South Wales Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Sevag Chalabian (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms T McDonald SC; Ms G Wright SC (Crown) Mr GA Brady SC Mr A Williams (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate