NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Oueik v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2022] NSWCATAD 132 Hearing dates: 28 March 2022 Date of orders: 26 April 2022 Decision date: 26 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Dunn, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES – administration – interest – remission Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Duties Act 1997 Land Tax Management Act 1956 (NSW) Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW) Cases Cited: Adams Bidco Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2019] NSWSC 702 Antegra Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] NSWSC 107 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (NSW) v Incise Technologies Pty Ltd [2004] NSWADTAP 19 EK Anderson Investments Pty Ltd ATF Cacs Property Trust v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2012] NSWADT 132 Gupta v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSWADT 187 Laviva Nominees Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCATAD 84 Lease A Leaf Property Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADTAP 41 RVO Enterprises Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2004] NSWADT 64 Singh v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2016] NSWCATAD 9 Trust Co of Australia Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2002] NSWADT 21 Winston-Smith v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2018] NSWSC 773 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ronny Oueik (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: N Karam (Accountant) (Applicant) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00354457
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate