NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Generosity Beverages Pty Ltd v Mare Custodian Company Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 484 Hearing dates: 17-18 November 2021, 4 and 31 March 2022 Date of orders: 26 April 2022 Decision date: 26 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: See at [92]. Catchwords: LAND LAW – contract for the sale of land – notice to complete – obligations of vendor and purchaser under contract for the sale of land – where purchaser issued notice to complete making time of the essence – where purchaser itself then failed to complete within the time specified in the notice to complete – where vendor terminates the contract – whether vendor validly terminated contract for sale by reason of purchaser's failure to complete – whether vendor in breach of contract by failing to provide keys to facilitate inspection of property – whether conduct of vendor a default that materially contributed to the failure of the purchaser to complete – whether vendor was itself ready, willing and able to perform its obligations to complete within the time specified in the notice to complete – held that vendor was entitled to terminate the contract – held that vendor is entitled to deposit Cases Cited: Abourjaily v Parkview Estate Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1256 Barrak Corporation Pty Ltd v Jaswil Properties Pty Ltd (2016) 18 BPR 35,759; [2016] NSWCA 32 Cumberland Consolidated Holdings, Ltd v Ireland [1946] 1 KB 264 Falconer v Wilson [1973] 2 NSWLR 131 Frankcombe v Foster Investments Pty Ltd [1978] 2 NSWLR 41 Michael Realty Pty Ltd v Carr [1977] 1 NSWLR 553 Point Glebe Pty Ltd v Lidofind Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,427 Psaltis v Schultz (1948) 76 CLR 547 Sentinel Orange Homemaker Pty Ltd v Davis Investment Group Holdings Pty Ltd (in liq) (2021) 20 BPR 41,497; [2021] NSWSC 550 Sharjade Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2009) 15 BPR 28,443; [2009] NSWCA 373 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Generosity Beverages Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mare Custodian Company Pty Ltd (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Hourigan with Mr M Isaac (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Mr P B Walsh (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate