NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Adriana Kostov under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2022] NSWSC 489 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 28 April 2022 Decision date: 28 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wright J Decision: The application for inquiry under s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) filed on 17 December 2020 is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application under s 78(1) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) for an inquiry into the applicant's conviction – matter previously dealt with under Pt 7 of the Act – matter has been the subject of appeal proceedings where proceedings withdrawn or been allowed to lapse – Court not satisfied special facts or special circumstances that justify the taking of further action – alternatively, no doubt or question raised about the applicant's guilt Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 254 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 78 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 25 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 196 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 47 Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), Pt 2, Div 2 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), s 32 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.14 Cases Cited: Application by AZ for inquiry into conviction pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2020] NSWSC 1048 Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Australian Capital Territory (2003) 214 CLR 318; [2003] HCA 28 Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; [1992] HCA 57 Douglas Harry Rendell (1987) 32 A Crim R 243 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions of the Kostov v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1122 Kostov v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2020] NSWCA 73 Kostov v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 94. Kostov v State of New South Wales (Vexatious Proceedings) [2018] NSWSC 1794 Milat, Ivan Robert Marko - Application under Section 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2015] NSWSC 209 Varley v Attorney-General in and for the State of New South Wales (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Texts Cited: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Adriana Kostov (Applicant) Attorney General for New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate