NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kang v University of Sydney [2022] NSWCATAD 135 Hearing dates: 14 July 2021 Date of orders: 28 April 2022 Decision date: 28 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Ransome, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative review – Government Information – access to emails between academics concerning research – whether overriding public interest against disclosure – transparency of research into SARS-CoV-2 – confidentiality of information – risk of harm to persons identified – prejudice to exercise of functions – prejudice to the conduct, effectiveness or integrity of research Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 University of Sydney Act 1989 Cases Cited: AEZ v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADT 90 Attorney-General's Department v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180 Bright v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2018] NSWCATAD 287 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Barrett [2015] NSWCATAP 68 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Camilleri [2012] NSWADTAP 19 DTB v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2019] NSWCATAD 114 Flack v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2011] NSWADT 286 Hurst v Wagga Wagga City Council [2011] NSWADT 307 Leech v Sydney Water Corporation [2010] NSWADT 298 Macquarie University v Howell (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 19 Newcastle City Council v Newcastle East Residents Action Group [2018] NSWCATAP 254 Office of Finance and Services v APV and APW [2014] NSWCATAP 88 Pemberton v UNSW [2014] NSWCATAD 19 Pembroke v Macquarie University [2014] NSWCATAD 76 Raven v The University of Sydney [2015] NSWCATAD 104 Salmon v Department of Justice (Corrective Services New South Wales) [2014] NSWCATAD 160 Turnbull v Strange [2018] NSWCA 157 Zonnevylle v Department of Education and Communities [2018] NSWCATAD 139 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dake Kang (Applicant) University of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Trahanas (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate