NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Weaver (No 6) [2022] NSWSC 502 Hearing dates: 12; 13; 14; 15; 19; 20; 21; 22 April 2022 Date of orders: 22 April 2022 Decision date: 22 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: Application for leave for witness to refresh her memory refused. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – witness evidence – refreshing memory – in court – application under s 32 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – consideration of the words "at such a time" in s 32(2)(b)(ii) – leave alternatively considered under s 192 considerations – leave refused Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 32, 66, 165, 192, Dictionary Cases Cited: Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485; [1993] HCA 15 C.A.L. No 14 Pty Ltd (T/as Tandara Motor Inn) v Motor Accidents Insurance Board (2009) 239 CLR 390; [2009] HCA 47 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606; [1998] HCA 61 R v Al Batat (No 15) [2020] NSWSC 1227 R v Graham [1973] CrimLR 629 R v Qaumi (No 38) [2016] NSWSC 743 R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 24) [2016] NSWSC 105 Roth (a Pseudonym) v R [2014] VSCA 242 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Scott David Weaver (Accused) Representation: Counsel: B. Costello (Crown) A. Evers (Counsel for the accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate