NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Spedding v State of New South Wales [2022] NSWSC 503 Hearing dates: 27 April 2022 Date of orders: 27 April 2022 Decision date: 27 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Order that the documents described in the Schedule be admitted over objection Catchwords: EVIDENCE – where plaintiff seeks to rely on evidence filed in other proceedings – whether tender of evidence offends UCPR 31.9 – whether documents subject to Harman undertaking Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 31.9 Cases Cited: British Thomson-Houston Company Ltd v British Insulated & Helsby Cables Ltd [1924] 2 Ch 160 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125; [2008] HCA 36 Printing Telegraph & Construction Co of Agents AGE & Havas Ltd v Drucker [1894] 2 QB 801 Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217; (1992) 110 ALR 685; 38 FLR 217; [1992] FCA 72 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: William Harrie Spedding (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Canceri with T O'Rourke (Plaintiff) A Williams with B Searson (Defendant)
Solicitors: O'Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor's Office (Defendant) File Number(s): 2019/00289937 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate