NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: GJA Kalra Pty Ltd v Amgade Pty Ltd and Anor [2022] NSWSC 509 Hearing dates: 11, 12, 13, 14 April 2022, further written submissions 21 and 22 April 2022 Decision date: 29 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Peden J Decision: (1) Plaintiff's claim is dismissed; (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs on the ordinary basis as agreed or assessed. (3) Grant leave to approach my Associate within 7 days by email if either party wishes to seek a different costs order. Catchwords: Promissory estoppel — Formal lease agreement —where representations of a rental rebate and replacement of a waste water management system made to first lessee who conveyed them to the assignee/plaintiff — Representations conditional and conditions not met — Reliance by the plaintiff unreasonable due to express lease provisions — No detriment established — No promissory estoppel established Cases Cited: Advance Fitness Corporation v Bondi Diggers Memorial [1999] NSWSC 264 Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Window Furnishings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 224 Black Uhlans Inc v New South Wales Crime Commission [2002] NSWSC 1060 Boyns v Lackey (1958) SR (NSW) 395 Brikom Investments Ltd v Carr [1979] 1 QB 467 Bullhead Pty Ltd v Brickmakers Place Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] VSCA 316 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 JPQS P/L v Cosmarnan Constructions P/L [2003] NSWCA 66 Kation Pty Ltd v Lamru Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 145 Lamshed v Lamshed (1963) 109 CLR 440 Legione v Hateley (1983) 132 CLR 406 Meehan v Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Tooheys (1993) 29 NSWLR 641 Todarello Property Investments Pty Ltd v GJA Kalra Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1678 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Zugic v Vesuvius Australia Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 106 Category: Principal judgment Parties: GJA Kalra Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Amgade Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Todarello Property Investments Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Mack and L James (Plaintiff) P Afshar (First and Second Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate