NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v ZT [2022] NSWSC 511 Hearing dates: 22, 23, 24, 25, 29 and 30 November 2021 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9 December 2021 11 March 2022 Date of orders: 29 April 2022 Decision date: 29 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: I sentence you to imprisonment of a non-parole period of 8 years commencing 5 September 2019 and expiring 4 September 2027 and the balance of the term of 4 years commencing 5 September 2025 and expiring on 4 September 2031. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – murder – victim impact statement – young offender – objective seriousness – extended joint criminal enterprise - psychological evidence – family and developmental history – psychological history – physical and mental health – drug and alcohol use – sexual abuse history – criminal history – future offending – risk assessment – general and specific deterrence – special circumstances – orders Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Apps v R [2006] NSWCCA 290 BM v R [2019] NSWCCA 223 Butters v R [2010] NSWCCA 1 Casey v R [2015] NSWCCA 142 Charbaji v R [2019] NSWCCA 28 Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 67 Clarke v R [2009] NSWCCA 49 Collier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 Dalley v R [2002] NSWCCA 284 DPP v Hersi [2020] VCC 347 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 GG v R [2018] NSWCCA 280 Goodbun v R [2020] NSWCCA 77 Kane v R [2001] NSWCCA 150 Langbein v R [2008] NSWCCA 38 Langbein v R [2013] NSWCCA 88 Lawson v R [2018] NSWCCA 215 Leslie v R [2009] NSWCCA 203 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Moore v R [2016] NSWCCA 185 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Munro v R [2006] NSWCCA 350 Perkins v R [2018] NSWCCA 62 Pfitzner v R [2010] NSWCCA 314 R v Barbetta [2008] NSWSC 688 R v Christoff [2003] NSWCCA 52 R v Cramp [1999] NSWCCA 324 R v Dalley [2000] NSWSC 1154 R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Elfar [2003] NSWCCA 358 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Geddes (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 554 R v Halloun [2014] NSWSC 1705 R v Hines (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1273 R v Irwin [2019] NSWCCA 133 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v Kaliti [2001] NSWCCA 268 R v Knight [2016] NSWCCA 292 R v KT [2008] NSWCCA 51 R v Little [2013] NSWCCA 288 R v Lulham [2016] NSWCCA 287 R v McGourty [2002] NSWCCA 335 R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381; (2002) 134 A Crim R 174 R v Safarjalani (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 105 R v Scott [2005] NSWCCA 152 R v Taha [2022] NSWCCA 46 R v Taufahema [2004] NSWSC 833 R v Wilson 2005 NSWCCA 112 Singh v R [2020] NSWCCA 353 Sumpton v R [2016] NSWCCA 162 SW v R [2013] NSWCCA 103 The Queen v Kilic (2016) 259 CLR 256; [2016] HCA The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Valentine v R [2020] NSWCCA 116 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) ZT (Offender) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate