NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Teng v FEV Mono Constructions (No 2) [2022] NSWCATCD 36 Hearing dates: Written submissions 24 December 2021; 11 January 2022; 28 January 2022 Date of orders: 25 March 2022 Decision date: 25 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: R Notley, Senior Member Decision: 1. The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of these proceedings on the ordinary basis as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS - Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam Law 93; 3 All ER 333; 3 WLR 586 Carlson v ARA Engine Reconditioning Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWCATAP 39 Deacon v National Strategic Constructions Pty Ltd; National Strategic Constructions Pty Ltd v Deacon (No 2) [2018] NSWCATAP 31 Eager v North Sydney Retirement Trust (No.2) [2019] NSWCATAP 92 Mendonca v Tonna [2017] NSWCATAP 176 Nadilo v Eagleton [2021] NSWCA 232 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs' Ex Parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Singapore Airlines Cargo Pty Ltd v Principle International Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 340 Thompson v Chapman [2017] NSWCATAP 64 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Frank Teng (Applicant) FEV Mono Constructions Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Blackman (Applicant) F Salama (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate