NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tisdale v Cumberland City Council (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 132 Hearing dates: 26 November 2021 Date of orders: 02 May 2022 Decision date: 02 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: D Robertson, Senior Member Emeritus Prof G Walker, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal refused. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Access to government information – Review of decision to refuse access – Agency relying upon confidential evidence not disclosed to the applicant – Procedural fairness – Government Information (Public Access) Act section 107 – Not inconsistent with requirements of procedural fairness for Tribunal to act on basis of confidential evidence Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) Cases Cited: Black v Hunter New England Local Health District [2011] NSWADT 295 Brazel v Sydney Water Corporation [2021] NSWCATAP 13 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Dezfouli v Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network [2018] NSWCATAD 11 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lauron v Michael [2021] NSWCATAP 120 Lettau v Artwork Transport Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 14 McKean v Department of Justice [2016] NSWCATAP 93 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Ros v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 70 Saul & Anor v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 91 Tisdale v Cumberland City Council [2021] NSWCATAD 132 Yuen v Thom [2016] NSWCATAP 243 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Terry Tisdale (Appellant) Cumberland City Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant self-represented Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00167113 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Citation: [2021] NSWCATAD 132 Date of Decision: 21 May 2021 Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member File Number(s): 2020/00226816; 2020/00224009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate