NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ters v Secretary of the Ministry of Health in respect of South Western Sydney Local Health District [2022] NSWIRComm 1034 Hearing dates: 11 April 2022 Date of orders: 4 May 2022 Decision date: 04 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Commissioner Webster Decision: The application in matter 2021/179129 is dismissed. Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW – Victimisation – notice of motion seeking the matter be dismissed – whether the respondent is the applicant's employer – whether the respondent must be the applicant's employer when relief is ordered - consideration of the Commission's powers to make orders to enforce victimisation provisions – the respondent was and remains the applicant's employer - the Commission does not have power to make the order sought – no reasonable cause of action Legislation Cited: Health Services Act 1997 (NSW) s 116H Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) ss 162, 210, 213 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) ss 33, 35 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 13.4 Cases Cited: Baker v Australian Workers Union [2005] NSWlRComm 1225 Barnier v Secretary, Department of Education [2021] NSWIRComm 1045 Bull v Attorney General (NSW) (1913) 17 CLR 370 Certain Lloyd's Underwriters v Cross (2012) 248 CLR 378 Child Protection (Working with Children) Award 2014 249 IR 420 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384 Cooper v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1999) 93 FCR 1076 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Public Service Association of NSW (o/b Morawsky) v Department of Justice [2017] NSWIRComm 1059 Rahman v Health Secretary in respect of the Sydney Local Health District and the South West Sydney Local Health District [2021] NSWIRComm 1065 Silsbury v Health Secretary in respect of Western Sydney Local Health District [2021] NSWIRComm 1004 Texts Cited: The Macquarie Online Dictionary Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Mary Ters (applicant)(respondent in the notice of motion)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate