NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bowers v Judicial Commission of New South Wales [2022] NSWCA 69 Hearing dates: 02 May 2022 Decision date: 02 May 2022 Before: White JA Decision: 1. Purported notice of appeal of 22 March 2022 dismissed as incompetent. 2. The respondent to the notice of motion of 7 April 2022, Mr James Bowers, pay the costs of the Judicial Commission of the notice of motion and the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL – Competency – Appeal brought purportedly as of right from refusal to vary orders – Appeal dismissed as incompetent Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow (2019) 269 CLR 333 Charisteas v Charisteas [2021] HCA 29 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Eliezer v Yang [2021] NSWCA 220 James Bowers v Judicial Commission of New South Wales [2021] NSWSC 1570 Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Bowers (Appellant/Respondent to Notice of Motion) Judicial Commission of New South Wales (Respondent/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: Appellant self represented P Herzfeld with D Farinha (Respondent/Applicant)
Solicitors: Appellant self represented Crown Solicitor of NSW (Respondent/Applicant) File Number(s): 2022/82151 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Common Law Division Citation: [2022] NSWSC 179 Date of Decision: 1 March 2022 Before: Wright J File Number(s): 2021/174248
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate