NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Contos v R [2022] NSWCCA 92 Hearing dates: 7 March 2022 Date of orders: 9 May 2022 Decision date: 09 May 2022 Before: Brereton JA at [1] N Adams J at [5] Lonergan J at [96] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – alleged error in assessment of objective seriousness – parity – applicant sentenced on agreed facts different to co-offenders – other facts disclosed more serious criminality – applicant instigated and planned offending, co-offenders assisted – no error in assessment of objective seriousness – no disparity – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 86(2)(3), 97(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 23, 33, 54D Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Huckstadt v R [2016] NSWCCA 22 Korovou v R [2021] NSWCCA 28 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Tuivaga v R [2015] NSWCCA 145 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dean Contos (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Johnston SC (Applicant) Mr G Newton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate