NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gilmore Finance Pty Ltd v Aesthete Pty Ltd atf the Real Money Unit Trust (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 557 Hearing dates: 14-21 and 24 March 2022; further submissions 25 March, 8, 22 and 29 April 2022 Date of orders: 10 May 2022 Decision date: 10 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Proceedings to be dismissed Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – investment in trusts established to develop two properties in Western Sydney – whether defendant trustees through their director and alleged agent made representations concerning the level of investment of other parties – whether plaintiff misled by such representation – where true level of other parties' investment revealed yet plaintiff maintained and increased its investment TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES – unit trusts established for purpose of proposed development of two properties in Western Sydney – whether unitholders failed to make required contributions – whether units had been issued at a discount – whether transactions entered without authority – whether proper accounting records maintained – whether trustees should be removed Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) Cases Cited: Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Gilmore Finance Pty Ltd v Aesthete Pty Ltd atf Real Money Unit Trust [2022] NSWSC 311 Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459; [2001] HCA 52 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Juul v Northey [2010] NSWCA 211 Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 494; [1998] HCA 69 Wardley Australia Ltd v State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514; [1992] HCA 55 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gilmore Finance Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Aesthete Pty Ltd as trustee for the Real Money Unit Trust (First Defendant) Aesthete No 3 Pty Ltd as trustee for the Hospital Precinct Unit Trust (Second Defendant) Farshad Amirbeaggi (Third Defendant) Vashti Elizabeth Conway (Fourth Defendant) Kate Elizabeth Yates (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R D Marshall SC with S W Aspinall and T Arnold (Plaintiff) D R Pritchard SC with A F Fernon SC and A Macauley (First, Second and Third Defendants) J P Knackstredt (Fourth and Fifth Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate