NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stewart v Spicer Thoroughbreds Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 558 Hearing dates: 26 and 27 April 2022 Decision date: 09 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Black J Decision: Proceedings dismissed. Parties to bring in agreed orders to give effect to this judgment and as to costs within 7 days. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Managed investment scheme — whether thoroughbred racing horse investment schemes are managed investment schemes as defined in s 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) — whether the schemes were required to be registered under s 601ED — whether the relevant contracts were voidable under s 601MB — whether a declaration should be made concerning an alleged contravention of s 911A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 9, s 79, s 601ED, s 601MB, s 911A, s 1012E Cases Cited: - Adler v Australian Securities and Investments Commission; Williams v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2003) 46 ACSR 504; 21 ACLC 1810; [2003] NSWCA 131 - Attorney-General (NSW); Ex rel Corporate Affairs v Australian Softwood Forests Pty Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR 73 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Great Northern Developments Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1087 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Karl Suleman Enterprizes Pty Ltd (in liq) (2003) 177 FLR 147; 45 ACSR 401; [2003] NSWSC 400 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Knightsbridge Managed Funds Ltd [2001] WASC 339 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Marco (No 6) [2020] FCA 1781 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Maxwell (2006) 59 ACSR 373; 24 ACLC 1308; [2006] NSWSC 1052 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v My Wealth Manager Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] FCA 10 - Australian Securities & Investments Commission v PE Capital Funds Management Ltd (admins apptd) [2022] FCA 76 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Pegasus Leveraged Options Group Pty Ltd (2002) 41 ACSR 561; [2002] NSWSC 310 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Primelife Corp Ltd (2005) 54 ACSR 536; [2005] FCA 1229 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Takaran Pty Ltd (2002) 43 ACSR 46 at 49; 28 ACLC 1732; [2002] NSWSC 834 - Brightwater Care Group (Inc) v Rossiter (2009) 40 WAR 84; [2009] WASC 229 - Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v International Litigation Funding Partners Pte Ltd (2009) 180 FCR 11; 260 ALR 643; 74 ACSR 447; [2009] FCAFC 147 - Burton v Aurcus (2006) 32 WAR 366; [2006] WASCA 71 - Karl Suleman Enterprizes Pty Ltd (in liq) v Babanour (2004) 49 ACSR 612; 22 ACLC 931; [2004] NSWCA 214 - McRobert Superannuation Pty Ltd v Cranston [2021] WASCA 126 - Waters v Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd (2012) 203 FCR 218; (2012) 90 ACSR 45; [2012] FCAFC 80 - Mier v FN Management Pty Ltd [2006] 1 Qd R 339; (2005) 56 ACSR 93; [2005] QCA 408 - Neeta (Epping) Pty Ltd v Phillips [1974] HCA 18 ; (1974) 131 CLR 286 - Pharmacy Guild of Australia v Ramsay Health Care Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1045 - Premium Income Fund Action Group Incorporated v Wellington Capital Ltd (2011) 84 ACSR 600; [2011] FCA 698 - Re Earth Civil Australia Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 966 - Re HIH Insurance Ltd and HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler (2002) 41 ACSR 72; 20 ACLC 576; [2002] NSWSC 171 - Re IW4U Pty Ltd (in liq) (2021) 150 ACSR 146; [2021] NSWSC 40 - Re Willmott Forests Limited (in liq) and Willmott Finance Pty Ltd (in liq) (2011) 85 ACSR 71 - Re York Street Mezzanine Pty Ltd (in liq) (2007) 162 FCR 358; 240 ALR 567; [2007] FCA 922 - Waters v Mercedes Holdings Pty Ltd (2012) 203 FCR 218; (2012) 90 ACSR 45; [2012] FCAFC 80 - Webster (Trustee) v Murray Goulburn Co-op Co Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 1260 Texts Cited: - J Woolf, The Declaratory Judgment (Sweet & Maxwell, 4th ed, 2011) - PW Young, C Croft and ML Smith, On Equity (Lawbook Co, 2009) Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Stewart (Plaintiff) Spicer Thoroughbreds Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Brad John Spicer (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Klineberg (Plaintiff) M Izzo SC/D Levi (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate