NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Goodwin (No. 2) [2022] NSWDC 153 Hearing dates: 04, 06 & 10 May 2022 Date of orders: 04, 06 & 10 May 2022 Decision date: 11 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: The accused application to exclude from the interview in which he participated with the police questions and answers 404 to 407 is refused The Crown may adduce evidence from Shaelene Elliott evidence of the representations set forth in paragraph [72] of her statement MFI 7. Upon the discharge of the third juror and with the consent of the accused and the Crown provided in writing the trial shall continue with nine jurors. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Jury — Discharge of individual juror JUDGEMENTS AND ORDERS — Ruling on evidence in advance of or in course of trial Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Jury Act 1977 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Tristan Goodwin (Accused) Representation: Ashlee Weir (Solicitor Advocate)
Joseph Simpson (counsel for the accused)
Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Limited (Accused) File Number(s): 2021/00068839 Publication restriction: No publication of the name of the complainant or of any information which may enable her identity to be ascertained Publication of this judgement is restricted until the conclusion of the trial
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate