NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Northside Veterinary Property Pty Ltd v Dalmacija Sydney Croatian Club Ltd [2022] NSWSC 589 Hearing dates: 28-30 March 2022; 21 April 2022 Date of orders: 16 May 2022 Decision date: 16 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Binding contract for sale of land held to have come into existence. Orders to be made in the nature of specific performance. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – corporate contracting – agency and authority – authority of directors to bind company to contract for the sale of land – contract executed in accordance with s 127(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where company claims that directors executing contract lacked actual or ostensible authority to bind company – whether plaintiff entitled to make assumptions in s 129 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether company precluded from asserting that assumptions are incorrect – not established that plaintiff actually knew or actually suspected that the company's constitution had not been complied with, or that directors were not properly performing their duties to the company – held that company precluded by s 128(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) from asserting non-compliance with its constitution or improper conduct on part of its directors – held that binding contract for sale came into existence EQUITY – specific performance – contract for the sale of land – discretionary defences to specific performance – where defendant claims lapse of time and protracted negotiations should defeat plaintiff's claim for specific performance – where defendant claims plaintiff was tricky in procuring contract – where defendant claims specific performance would occasion great hardship upon it – where defendant claims that damages would be an adequate remedy – held that no bar to decree of specific performance had been demonstrated – held appropriate to order specific performance Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 127(1), s 128, s 129 Registered Clubs Act 1976 (NSW), s 41E Cases Cited: Adderley v Dixon (1824) 1 Sim & St 607; 57 ER 239 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Frenmast Pty Ltd (2013) 282 FLR 351; [2013] NSWCA 459 Caratti v Mammoth Investments Pty Ltd (2016) 50 WAR 84; [2016] WASCA 84 Dougan v Ley (1946) 71 CLR 142 Longtom Pty Ltd v Oberon Shire Council (1996) 7 BPR 14,799 Morris v Kanssen [1946] AC 459 Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1990) 170 CLR 146 Norton v Angus (1926) 38 CLR 523 Sindel v Georgiou (1984) 154 CLR 661 Soyfer v Earlmaze Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1068 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Texts Cited: The Honourable RP Austin and the Honourable Justice AJ Black, LexisNexis Butterworths, Austin & Black's Annotations to the Corporations Act (online at January 2022) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Northside Veterinary Property Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Dalmacija Sydney Croatian Club Ltd (First Defendant) Matthew Vlatko (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr R S Angyal SC (Plaintiff) Mr A Hourigan with Mr M Isaac (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate