NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Agostino v Penrith City Council [2022] NSWLEC 1258 Hearing dates: 22-23 March 2022 Date of orders: 23 May 2022 Decision date: 23 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) The development application DA21/0432 is determined by the grant of consent for alterations and additions to the existing fruit and vegetable store at 312 Third Avenue, Llandilo (the land) subject to the conditions in Annexure A, except for the enlargement, expansion and intensification of the use of the fruit and vegetable store into the existing metal farm shed on the land. Catchwords: APPEAL – development application concerning alterations and additions to fruit and vegetable store – existing use rights – extent of land used for existing use when derived from a development consent – meaning of relevant date – construction of a development consent Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.65, 4.66, 4.67, 8.7 Environmental Planning and Assessment Model Provisions 1980, s 4 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cll 39, 41, 42, 43 Local Government Act 1919 Penrith Local Environmental Plan 2010, cl 1.8 Penrith Interim Development Order (IDO) No.93 Penrith Local Environmental Plan No 201 (Rural Lands) (Amendment No 1) Penrith Local Environmental Plan No 201 (Rural Lands) (Amendment No 8) Penrith Local Environmental Plan No 201 (Rural Lands), cll 9, 41 Cases Cited: Agostino v Penrith City Council (2010) 172 LGERA 380; [2010] NSWCA 20 Botany Bay City Council v Pet Carriers International Pty Ltd (2013) 201 LGERA 116; [2013] NSWLEC 147 Brinara Pty Ltd v Gosford City Council (2010) 177 LGERA 296; [2010] NSWLEC 230 Butler Street Community Network Incorporated v Northern Region Joint Regional Planning Panel (2017) 226 LGERA 213; [2017] NSWLEC 51 Lemworth Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 371; [2001] NSWCA 389 Minister for Planning v Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd (2003) 126 LGERA 181; [2003] NSWCA 119 Royal Motor Yacht Club (Broken Bay) Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 56 Scully v Leichhardt Council (1994) 85 LGERA 109 Steedman v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (No 1) (1991) 87 LGERA 26 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Antonio Agostino (Applicant) Penrith City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Hemmings; T Poisel (Applicant) T To (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate