NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Davey v R [2022] NSWDC 168 Hearing dates: 9 May 2022 Date of orders: 19 May 2022 Decision date: 19 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Scotting DCJ Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) The convictions and penalties imposed by the magistrate are set aside. (3) The associated ADO should be set aside. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeal and review — Appeal from Local Court to District Court Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Cases Cited: AG v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] NSWCA 218 Charara v R [2006] NSWCCA 244 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 Gianoutsas v Glykis [2006] NSWCCA 137 Lumney v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 186 M v R (1994) 181 CLR 487 Mahmood v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 397 McNab v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 298 R v Conlon (1993) 69 A Crim R 92 R v Katarzynski [2002] NSWCCA 613 R v Viro (1978) 141 CLR 88 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary Category: Procedural rulings Parties: James Davey v ODPP Representation: Counsel: C Soto (Appellant)
Solicitors: ODPP (Prosecutor) Joshua Blom Lawyers (Appellant) File Number(s): 20/331110 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate