NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jennifer Helen Papadam v Smidam Pty Limited [2022] NSWSC 629 Hearing dates: 28 March 2022 Date of orders: 18 May 2022 Decision date: 18 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Williams J Decision: See paragraph [62] Catchwords: RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS – court-appointed receiver – remuneration – no question of principle CORPORATIONS – where receiver appointed to assets and undertaking of corporate trustee of self-managed superannuation fund – where directors of trustee unable to work together – where directors are also the members of the fund – where directors and members consent to receiver's application under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 420(2)(u) and 461(1)(k) to wind up the trustee with a view to the liquidator then causing the trustee to exercise its powers under the trust deed to wind up the fund – where company's powers under trust deed (including power to wind up trust) may have ceased upon appointment of receiver due to ipso facto clause in trust deed – where winding up would result in the trustee being a disqualified person under Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth), s 120(2)(e) and any step taken by trustee company in liquidation to wind up the fund (assuming it had power to do so) would be an offence under s 126K of that Act – winding up order refused Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 420, 461 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth), ss 35B, 35C, 35D, 120, 126K Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 67 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 26.4 Cases Cited: Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2019) 268 CLR 524; [2019] HCA 20 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v The Mai Family Pty Ltd (in liq) (2019) 136 ACSR 638; [2019] FCA 865 Re Gondon Five Pty Ltd and Cui Family Asset Management Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 469 Re Say Enterprises Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 396 Re Stansfield DIY Wealth Pty Ltd (in liq) (2014) 103 ACSR 401; [2014] NSWSC 1484 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Daniel Frisken in his capacity as Receiver and Manager of Smidam Pty Ltd (Applicant) Jennifer Helen Papadam (Plaintiff) Smidam Pty Limited (First Defendant) Anthony David Smith (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Connor (Applicant) Mr J Simpkins (Plaintiff) Mr A Smith (self-represented) (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate