NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bonanno v Finamore (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 641 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 23 May 2022 Decision date: 23 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: Without affecting the validity of any prior costs orders made by the Court in these proceedings, order the plaintiff to pay 60% of the defendants' costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: ESTOPPEL — issue estoppel — decisions to which applicable — Court made orders by consent as to agreed facts in accordance with Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 191 — parties agreed on monetary amount of one-third share of net income of property in the case that the Court found the plaintiff to be entitled to one-third share in income — order quantifies amount that remained unpaid — order qualifies amount as calculated up to the date of the hearing or beyond — plaintiff seeks further accounting in respect of net profits — whether plaintiff prevented from such relief by Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 191 COSTS — party/party — general rule that costs follow the event — application of the rule and discretion — five costs orders already made in the proceedings — defendants achieve some degree of success on certain issues — whether degree of success achieved by defendants justifies order that plaintiff pay proportion of defendants' costs — plaintiff ordered to pay 60 per cent of defendants' costs on ordinary basis Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 191 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1 Cases Cited: Bonanno v Finamore [2021] NSWSC 1558 Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Breakout Barrier Release Systems Pty Ltd v Breakout Barrier Release Systems Australasia Ltd (Costs) [2013] NSWSC 1955 Roache v News Group Newspapers Ltd [1992] TLR 551 Sayour v Elliott (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 146 Category: Costs Parties: Salvatore Antonio Bonanno (Plaintiff) Nicola Finamore (First Defendant) Weisen Zhou (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Foster (Plaintiff) D A Woods (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate