NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Arnold v Persson [2022] NSWLEC 1270 Hearing dates: 29 November 2021 Date of orders: 27 May 2022 Decision date: 27 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Galwey AC Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The application is refused. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – Pt 2A application – neighbouring hedges – palms – whether the trees are planted to form a hedge – obstruction of views – whether the obstruction is severe – balancing the parties' interests – whether orders should be made Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987, s 34 Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Pt 2A ss 14A, 14B, 14E, 14F Cases Cited: Barnes v Loveridge; Unicomb v Loveridge [2016] NSWLEC 1108 Condon v Scott [2021] NSWLEC 1160 Fryday v The Owners – Strata Plan No 15039 [2019] NSWLEC 1150 Johnson v Angus [2012] NSWLEC 1207 Johnson v Angus (2012) 190 LGERA 334; [2012] NSWLEC 192 McDougall v Philip [2011] NSWLEC 1280 Tenacity Consulting v Waringah (2004) 134 LGERA 23; [2004] NSWLEC 140 Texts Cited: Department of Justice and Attorney General, Review of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (November 2009) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Arnold (Applicant) Jeffrey Persson (First Respondent) Patricia McIntosh (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Tsang (Applicant) P Persson (Self-represented and Agent) (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate