NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bisiker v R [2022] NSWCCA 110 Hearing dates: 4 May 2022 Date of orders: 1 June 2022 Decision date: 01 June 2022 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Kirk JA at [2]; Price J at [34] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal out of time. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: APPEALS — Appeal against sentence — Severity — Whether sentence was manifestly excessive — Multiple offences — Accumulation, concurrency and totality — Where criminality involved in offences under the Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) is distinct from criminality of other offences Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 (NSW), s 17(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 91H(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44(2) Criminal Code (Cth), ss 474.19, 474.24A(1) Cases Cited: Berryman v R [2017] NSWCCA 297 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie (2017) 270 A Crim R 556; [2017] NSWCCA 301 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Huggett v R [2021] NSWCCA 62 Lyons v R [2017] NSWCCA 204 Nguyen v The Queen (2016) 256 CLR 656; [2016] HCA 17 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 R v Porte (2015) 252 A Crim R 294; [2015] NSWCCA 174 R v XX (2009) 195 A Crim R 38; [2009] NSWCCA 115 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Arthur George Bisiker (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate