NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Mack v R [2022] NSWCCA 114 Hearing dates: 20 April 2022 Date of orders: 08 June 2022 Decision date: 08 June 2022 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Harrison J at [1] Fagan J at [1] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against sentence. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – appeal against sentence – supply prohibited drug – possess unauthorised prohibited firearm – possess more than three unregistered firearms – whether sentencing judge erred in sentencing the applicant twice in relation to the same offence – whether sentencing judge erred by failing to take into account the applicant's mental health status – whether sentencing judge erred in assessing objective seriousness – whether sentence was manifestly excessive – error conceded – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 33 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 167 Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(1) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 7(1), 51D(2) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; (2010) A Crim R 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; (2014) 238 A Crim R 134; [2014] HCA 37 Mack v R; Mack v R [2009] NSWCCA 216 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575; [2004] NSWCCA 434 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wayne Raymond Mack (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H White (Applicant) M Millward (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate