Dogramaci v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2022] NSWCA 83

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dogramaci v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2022] NSWCA 83 Hearing dates: 5 April 2022 Date of orders: 3 June 2022 Decision date: 03 June 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; White JA at [34]; Simpson AJA at [44]. Decision: (1) Refuse an extension of time for the late filing of the applicant's summons dated 21 September 2021. (2) Dismiss the applicant's summons with costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — road traffic infringement notice — application for judicial review of District Court decision on appeal from Local Court — whether applicant denied procedural fairness in relation to admission of further evidence in District Court Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 11(1), 18, 19 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 176 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 33, 79 Road Rules 2014 (NSW), r 20 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 59.10 Cases Cited: Dyason v Butterworth [2015] NSWCA 52 Garde v Dowd (2011) 80 NSWLR 620; [2011] NSWCA 115 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Macpherson v The Queen (1981) 147 CLR 512; [1981] HCA 46 Mohareb v Saratoga Marine Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 235 Mulder v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2015] NSWCA 92; (2015) 250 A Crim R 154 R v Gidley (1984) 3 NSWLR 168 Wishart v Fraser (1941) 64 CLR 470; [1941] HCA 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Abdullah Sedat Dogramaci (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A S Dogramaci (self-represented) E Balodis (First Respondent) Submitting appearance (Second Respondent)