NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Forest v Suzanne [2022] NSWCATAP 188 Hearing dates: 25 May 2022 Date of orders: 8 June 2022 Decision date: 06 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: K Rosser, Principal Member Decision: (1) The appellant's interlocutory application is dismissed. (2) The Registrar is directed not to publish these reasons for decision on the Caselaw website before 6 July 2022. Catchwords: APPEAL – Interlocutory application – non-disclosure – abuse of process Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 Cases Cited: Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256 DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2020] NSWCA 136 Hunter and v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police (1982) AC 529 Kostov v Ecclesia Housing Limited (No 3) [2018] NSWCATAP 221 Misrachi v Public Guardian [2019] NSWCA 67 PR v MDM [2020] NSWCATAP 151 State of New South Wales (Justice Health) and anor v Dezfouli [2008] NSWADTAP 69 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Texts Cited: "The Tort of Collateral Abuse of Process" UNSW Law Journal Volume 44(2) p 714 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wendy Forest (Appellant) Emma-Louise Suzanne (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self Represented) Respondent (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2022/00060313 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 15 February 2022 Before: S Hanstein, General Member File Number(s): RT 21/41203
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate