NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Holdsworth v Daddo [2022] NSWLEC 1302 Hearing dates: 23 May 2022 Date of orders: 23 May 2022 Decision date: 23 May 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Douglas AC Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The application is refused. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – high hedges; trees do not constitute a hedge; obstruction of view is not severe Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Pt 2A s 14A, 14B, 14E Cases Cited: Grantham Holdings Pty Ltd v Miller [2011] NSWLEC 1122 Haindl v Daisch [2011] NSWLEC 1145 Hornsby Shire Council v Malcolm (1986) 60 LGRA 429 Johnson v Angus (2012) 190 LGERA 334; [2012] NSWLEC 192 Murray v Shoebridge [2007] NSWLEC 785 P. Baer Investments Pty Limited v University of New South Wales [2007] NSWLEC 128 Wisdom v Payn [2011] NSWLEC 1012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stuart Holdsworth (First Applicant) Leanne Holdsworth (Second Applicant) Lachlan Daddo (First Respondent) Karina Daddo (Second Respondent) Representation: S Holdsworth (Sself-represented) (First Applicant) L Holdsworth (Sself-represented) (Second Applicant) L Daddo (Sself-represented) (First Respondent) K Daddo (Sself-represented) (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/3275 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate