NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Thiab v Western Sydney University [2022] NSWSC 760 Hearing dates: 16 May 2022 Date of orders: 10 June 2022 Decision date: 10 June 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [168]-[174] Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – political discrimination – university statute prohibits denial of progression within university because of students' religious or political affiliations, views or beliefs – university nursing degree requires students to complete clinical placements approved by university – student expresses scepticism about safety of Covid-19 vaccination – university cancels student's clinical placements – internal university disciplinary tribunal makes reinstatement of placements conditional on student making written acknowledgement of unprofessional conduct – whether discrimination "because of" student's views or beliefs about Covid-19 vaccination – Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia Code of Conduct – whether student's views or beliefs about Covid-19 vaccination are "religious or political" Legislation Cited: Cambridge University Act 1856 (19 & 20 Vict c 88) Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (Vic), s 21 Extradition Act 1870 (33 & 34 Vict c 52) Macquarie University Act 1989, ss 24, 25 Oxford University Act 1854 (17 & 18 Vict c 81) Supreme Court Act 1970, s 69 University and University Colleges Act 1900, s 18 University of New South Wales Act 1989, ss 23, 24 University of Sydney Act 1850, s 20 University of Sydney Act 1989, ss 31, 32 Universities Test Act 1871 (34 & 35 Vict c 26) Western Sydney University Act 1997, ss 5, 6, 22, 35, 36, 40 Cases Cited: Alajmi v Macquarie University [2019] NSWSC 1026 Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay (No 1) (2012) 248 CLR 500 Cheng v Governor of Pentonville Prison [1973] AC 931 Clark v University of Lincolnshire and Humberside [2001] 1 WLR 1988 Clubb v Edwards (2019) 267 CLR 171 Griffith University v Tang (2005) 221 CLR 99 Nestle Australia Ltd v Equal Opportunity Board [1990] VR 805 Palko v Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937) Ridd v James Cook University [2021] HCA 32 Toben v Jones (2003) 129 FCR 515 Texts Cited: Dicey, A V, Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century, ed Richard VandeWetering (Liberty Fund, 2008) Heydon, J D, M J Leeming and P G Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines & Remedies (LexisNexis Butterworths, 5th ed, 2015) Popper, K, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge, 2nd ed, 2002) Priestland, D, The Red Flag: A History of Communism (Grove Press, 2009) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nera Thiab (Plaintiff) Western Sydney University (First Defendant) Leanne Hunt (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Mando (Plaintiff) SJ Walsh (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate