NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dean v R [2022] NSWCCA 122 Hearing dates: 11 May 2022 Date of orders: 15 June 2022 Decision date: 15 June 2022 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Rothman J [46]; Dhanji J at [47] Decision: Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against conviction — whether guilty verdicts unreasonable by reason of inconsistency with not guilty verdict — logical and rational basis for distinction drawn by jury Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61M(2), 66C(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Cases Cited: BF v R [2019] NSWCCA 321 DS v R [2021] NSWCCA Ganiji v R [2019] NSWCCA 208 Holloway v R [2017] NSWCCA 17 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439; [1997] HCA 56 Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559; [2007] HCA 30 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 MA v R [2022] NSWCCA 61 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 MG v R [2017] NSWCCA 14 Nguyen v R [2017] NSWCCA 145 Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123; [2020] HCA 12 R v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v TK (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 Shiv v R [2021] NSWCCA 245 Vasilevski v R [2019] NSWCCA 277 Z (a pseudonym) v R [2022] NSWCCA 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nicholas Leighton Dean (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Hall SC (Applicant) C Curtis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate