NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: JKAM Investments Pty Ltd v Damien (No. 2) [2022] NSWSC 763 Hearing dates: 6 December 2021 Date of orders: 10 June 2022 Decision date: 10 June 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: See paragraph [121]. Catchwords: DAMAGES – plaintiff partially successful in claims for misleading and deceptive conduct and in a claim for indemnity under a mortgage during a hearing on issues relating to liability – damages hearing then takes place – plaintiff elects to pursue indemnity based on the mortgage and abandons an inconsistent remedy for misleading and deceptive conduct that would otherwise result in the mortgage being set aside – whether all the plaintiff's damages were caused by the misleading and deceptive conduct of the defendant – what particular legal costs and expenses are recoverable under the indemnity clause in the mortgage. COSTS – plaintiff successful on some but not all issues in the principal proceedings – what costs orders are appropriate in the circumstances – what costs order should be made in respect of the damages hearing. CIVIL PROCVEDURE – damages hearing after hearing on liability – during damages hearing plaintiff advances extensive claims for indemnity on a mortgage in respect to a range of legal costs and expenses which have not been the subject of detailed pleadings and were not the subject of specific determination during the liability hearing – whether the damages hearing is an appropriate vehicle for the determination of these claims. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c) Cases Cited: Australian & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Pollard [2012] SASC 133 Credland v Potter (1874) LR 10 Ch App 8 JKAM Investments Pty Ltd ACN 159 084 018 v Damien [2021] NSWSC 70 Deeley v Loyd's Bank (No. 2) (1909) 53 Sol Jo 419 EMI Records v Wallace [1988] 2 All ER 980 Mead v Watson [2005] NSWCA 133 Overton Investments Pty Ltd v Cuzeno RVM Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 27 Project Research Pty Ltd v Permanent Trustee of Australia Ltd (1990) 5 BPR 11 Pearce v Watkins (1852) 64 ER 1132 Beddoe, In re; Downs v Cottam [1893] 1 Ch 547 Kyabram Property Investments Pty Ltd v Murray [2005] NSWSC 1202 Texts Cited: ELG Tyler, PW Young and CE Croft, Fisher and Lightwood's Law of Mortgages (3rd ed, 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: JKAM Investments Pty Ltd Defendant/Cross-Claimant: Karl Damien Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: L. Katsinas Defendant/Cross-Claimant: C. Stomo
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate