NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chandler v R [2022] NSWCCA 124 Hearing dates: 27 May 2022 Date of orders: 10 June 2022 Decision date: 10 June 2022 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Button J at [30]; N Adams J at [31] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – principle of parity – where applicant and co-offender pleaded guilty to different offences arising from identical facts – where different offences reflected different levels of moral and criminal culpability CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – aggravating factors – in company – Applicant carried out offence in company with co-offender – where co-offender pleaded guilty to lesser offence on the basis of joint criminal enterprise – whether the fact that Applicant was in company was an element of his offending SENTENCING – appeal against sentence – co-offenders – disparity between sentences – applicant shot victim in leg after co-offender lured him into position – applicant and co-offender pleaded guilty to different offences arising from identical facts – where maximum penalty for applicant's offence is 25 years' imprisonment compared to 10 years for co-offender's offence – where applicant's moral and criminal culpability significantly higher than that of co-offender – where applicant obtained lesser discount than co-offender for guilty plea – whether there was unjustifiable disparity between applicant and co-offender's sentences SENTENCING – appeal against sentence – aggravating factors – in company – Applicant carried out offence in company with co-offender – where co-offender pleaded guilty to lesser offence on the basis of joint criminal enterprise – whether the fact that Applicant was in company was an element of his offending Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 33A, 93G Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 10(1)(a), 21A(2), 25D, 25E Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 166 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) s 65(3) Cases Cited: Daw v R [2017] NSWCCA 327 Gaggioli v R [2014] NSWCCA 246 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kadwell (a pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 42 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 R v Birchell [2020] NSWDC 69 Tabbah v R [2019] NSWCCA 324 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dylan Zachary Chandler (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate