NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Benjamin & Khoury Pty Ltd v Rahme [2022] NSWSC 766 Hearing dates: 31 May 2022 Date of orders: 14 June 2022 Decision date: 14 June 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) In proceedings 2021/330107: (a) On condition that the plaintiff pays into court the sum of $196,554 by 12 July 2022, stay the enforcement of the judgment until the determination of the appeal; (b) Order that costs be costs in the appeal. (2) In proceedings 2021/330110: (a) On condition that the plaintiff pays into court the sum of $93,170 by 12 July 2022, stay the enforcement of the judgment until the determination of the appeal; (b) Order that costs be cost in the appeal. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – stay of execution – where appeal lodged – judgments created by registration of certificate of costs assessor - whether "proceedings" constituted by registration – appeal against Review Panel determination - appeal by way of rehearing – whether Part 7 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 precluded reliance on ss 67 and 135 of the Civil Procedure Act - whether serious question to be tried at hearing of the appeal – where balance of convenience lies – stay granted on condition of partial payment into court of judgment sum Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 67, 133, 135, Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459E District Court Act 1973 (NSW) s 4 Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) ss 208H, 208J, 208KF Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) s 352 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 No 16 (NSW) s 71, 73, 77, 88, 89, 90, Legal Profession Regulation 2005 (NSW) s 352 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 16 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 20.14, 50.7 Cases Cited: Akierman Holdings Pty Limited v Akerman (No 3); In the matter of Akierman Holdings Pty Limited (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 869 Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (Receivers Appointed) (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Ballard v Carlisle Attorneys Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 769 Behnia v Sarraf (No 2) [2019] NSWDC 281 Brierley v Anthony Charles Reeves T/as Kaplan Reeves & Co & Ors [2000] NSWSC 305 Currabubula & Paola v State Bank NSW; Currabubula v State Bank NSW [2000] NSWSC 232 Daley v Hughes (2014) 86 NSWLR 729; [2014] NSWCA 268 Diemasters Pty Ltd and Ors v Meadowcorp Pty Ltd, Narendra Jain and Charles Chelliah (Unrep, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Macready M, 16 July 2003) Doyle v Hall Chadwick [2007] NSWCA 159 Firth v Centrelink (2002) 55 NSWLR 451; [2002] NSWSC 564 Flexible Manufacturing Systems v Alter [2004] NSWSC 29 Fordyce v Leung [2022] NSWCA 55 Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 737; [2002] NSWCA 383 Patterson v Cohen [2005] NSWSC 635 Rahme v Benjamin & Khoury Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 211 Rahme v Benjamin & Khoury Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 239 Tanamerah Estates Pty Ltd v Tibra Capital Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 383 Vaughan v Dawson [2008] NSWCA 169 Voicu v The Owners-Strata Plan No 1624 [2020] NSWSC 296 Wentworth v Rogers; Wentworth & Russo v Rodgers (2006) 66 NSWLR 474; [2006] NSWCA 145 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Benjamin & Khoury Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Dana Therese Rahme (First Defendant) John Sharpe (Second Defendant) Gregory Walsh OAM (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Smith (Plaintiff) C J Bevan (First Defendant) Submitting appearances (Second & Third Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate