NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kallman v Veterinary Practitioners Board [2022] NSWCATOD 60 Hearing dates: 14 October 2020 Date of orders: 14 June 2022 Decision date: 14 June 2022 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: N S Isenberg RFD, Senior Member (Legal) Dr T Carter, Senior Member Emeritus Professor PJ Foreman AM General Member (Community) Decision: (1) The decision under review is affirmed. (2) The Applicant pay the costs of the Respondent, of and incidental to these proceedings, as agreed or assessed on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE – registered veterinary practitioner – allegations including that the applicant discharged a non-ambulatory dog with tick poisoning – Veterinary Practitioners Code of Professional Conduct – finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct – issue of caution and fine of $1,000 – correct and preferable decision COSTS – exception to s 60 (each party pay their own costs) – cl 26, Division 6, Part 4 of Schedule 5 to the CAT Act (costs payable by applicant) - whether there are special circumstances Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW). Veterinary Practice Act 2003 (NSW) Veterinary Practice Regulation 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bureau of Health Care Services v Jan H Po/ DVM, State of Michigan Court of Appeals, No 327346, June 23, 2016 Dekker v Medical Respondent of Australia 2014 WASCA 216 Gallagher v Veterinary Practitioners Board of New South Wales [2014] NSWCAOD 132 Pillai v Messiter (No 2) (1989) New South Wales Court of Appeals 16 NSWLR 197 (sic) Spate v Veterinary Practitioners Board of NSW [2017] NSWCATOD 139 Veterinary Practitioners Board of New South Wales v Gallagher [2015] NSWSC 1233 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dr Mark Kallman (Applicant) Veterinary Practitioners Board (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Edwards (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate