NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wiggett v Stone [2022] NSWSC 771 Hearing dates: 09 June 2022 Date of orders: 10 June 2022 Decision date: 10 June 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: 1. The proceedings must be dismissed. 2. Under r 42.1 of the Uniform Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) costs follow the event, Mr Wiggett must thus pay the liquidator's costs, as agreed or assessed. Unless the parties approach to be heard within 7 days, that will be the Court's order. 3. If there is any dispute they should file proposed orders and short submissions to be considered on the papers. Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDGES — Courts — cross-vesting — where first defendant as liquidator has brought proceedings against plaintiffs in District Court for insolvent trading and seeks recovery — where second plaintiff has commenced proceedings in Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for division of matrimonial property — where first plaintiff seeks orders to remove District Court proceedings to Supreme Court and then transfer to Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia — where orders are opposed by liquidator — whether Supreme Court should exercise its power — Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 140 — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1337H — interests of justice — balance of relevant factors — whether proceedings are intertwined or discrete — orders refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 140 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 588G, 588H, 588M, 1337C, 1337H Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 79 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 42.1 Cases Cited: Bankinvest AG v Seabrook (1988) 14 NSWLR 711 Bellamy v Gladwell (No 2) [2017] FamCAFC 238 BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz (2004) 221 CLR 400; [2004] HCA 61 BOC v MDL [2019] NSWSC 278 Browne v Green [1999] FamCA 1483; (1999) 25 Fam LR 482 In the Marriage of Hickey [2003] FamCA 395; (2003) 30 Fam LR 355 In the matter of Peter G Ward Industries Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 339 In the matter of PJL Group Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 756 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513; [1986] HCA 17 Parry v WGE Engineering Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 337 Roff v Aqua Distributors Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 966; (1996) 22 ACSR 248 Valceski v Valceski (2007) 70 NSWLR 36; [2007] NSWSC 440 Vaughan v Frost [2010] NSWSC 492 Yara Pilbara Fertilisers Pty Ltd v Oswal (No 8) [2015] FCA 49 Zhu v Tech Universal (HK-Macau) Development Pty Ltd, in the matter of Tech Universal (HK-Macau) Development Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 256; (2005) 53 ACSR 704 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dominic Wiggett (First Plaintiff) Elke Wiggett (Second Plaintiff) Richard Stone (First Defendant) Zorro Pressure Cleaning Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M McGirr (Plaintiffs) J Raftery (Defendants) Solicitors: McPhee Kelshaw (First Plaintiff) Ziman & Ziman (Second Plaintiff) Roser Lawyers (First and Second Defendants) File Number(s): 2022/22003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate