NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kelly v Burston (No.2) [2021] NSWDC 794 Hearing dates: 16 September 2021 Date of orders: 16 September 2021 Decision date: 16 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: Order: (1) The document headed "Further Amended Statement of Claim" date 21 April 2021 is struck out with leave to replead. (2) The plaintiff is to file the following documents in 21days : (a) Amended Statement of Claim giving proper particulars of identification, pleading implication of appropriate for a group of liable (including any pleading of innuendo), and deleting particulars of malice (b) A Reply particularising malice. (3) Plaintiff is to pay the defendant's cost of the application. (4) Matter stood over to the Defamation List on Thursday 21 October 2021 at 9am. Catchwords: TORT – defamation – application to strike out the current form of the statement of claim – pleading of imputations for a group libel – inclusion of material on malice in the statement of claim – whether leave to replead should be granted – leave granted Cases Cited: Kelly v Burston (District Court (NSW), 15 April 2021, unrep McCormick v John Fairfax & Sons (1989) 16 NSWLR 485 Morten Christiansen v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd & Ors [2012] NSWSC 1258 Lazarus v Deutsche-Lufthansa AG (1985) 1 NSWLR 188 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Plaintiff: Peter James Kelly Defendant: Brian Burston Representation: Plaintiff: self-represented
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate