NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McCosker v R [2022] NSWCCA 127 Hearing dates: 3 June 2022 Decision date: 17 June 2022 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL; Adamson J; Bellew J Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted in respect of grounds (1), (2) and (3). (2) Leave refused in respect of ground (4). (3) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — whether disparity between sentence imposed on applicant compared to co-offender — where open to sentencing judge to assess relative culpability as similar — where open to sentencing judge to impose same pre-discount sentence on both offenders — leave to appeal granted — ground not made out CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — whether sentencing judge could make finding on time of death based on evidence — where evidence existed — where ground devoid of merit and unduly technical — leave to appeal not granted Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 4, 191 Cases Cited: ASP v R [2007] NSWSC 339 Lloyd v R [2017] NSWCCA 303 R v Garforth (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 23 May 1994, unrep) R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v Stone [2020] NSWSC 1485 The Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270; [1999] HCA 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Troy Lee McCosker (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R J Wilson SC (Applicant) M Kumar / D Beaufils (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate