NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Qin v R [2022] NSWCCA 137 Hearing dates: 13 April 2022 Date of orders: 29 June 2022 Decision date: 29 June 2022 Before: Brereton JA at [1] Garling J at [2] Hamill J at [59] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Appeal upheld. (3) Quash the sentence imposed by Culver DCJ on 25 March 2020. (4) In lieu of that sentence, impose an aggregate sentence with a non-parole period of 10 years and 8 months and an additional term of 5 years and 4 months to commence on 20 February 2017. (5) The non-parole period for that sentence will expire on 19 October 2027. Catchwords: SENTENCING — appeal against sentence — subjective considerations on sentence — finding by sentencing judge of special circumstances — finding not reflected in total effective sentence — appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 ss 24(2), 25(2) Crimes Act 1900 s 93T(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 44, 53A(2) Criminal Code (Cth) s 307.12(1) Cases Cited: Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 Z v R [2014] NSWCCA 323 Texts Cited: Not applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yuchao Qin (App) The Crown (Resp) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (App) E Nicholson (Resp)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate