NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Majak v Byrnes & Anor [2022] NSWDC 222 Hearing dates: 16 June 2022 Date of orders: 23 June 2022 Decision date: 23 June 2022 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Dismiss the plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed on 24 March 2022. (2) Order the plaintiff to pay the costs of the defendants of and incidental to the Notice of Motion. (3) Direct that the Exhibits and MFIs be returned. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – application to set aside orders made after hearing – whether orders made irregularly, illegally or against good faith Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.4, 36.15 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 263A Cases Cited: Bobolas v Waverley Council [2014] NSWCA 131 Choi v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police (No. 2) [2021] NSWCA 290 Coles v Burke (1987) 10 NSWLR 429 Perpetual Trustees Australia Ltd v Heperu Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2009] NSWCA 387; (2009) 78 NSWLR 190 Kendell v Carnegie [2006] NSWCA 302; (2006) 68 NSWLR 193 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW, (LexisNexis looseleaf service) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Zofia Bozena Majak (Plaintiff) (Self-represented) Russell Craig Byrnes trading as Byrnes Legal (First Defendant) Alan Wesley Rose (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Ng (First Defendant) J-J Loofs SC and L James (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate