NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sebie v Pham (No 5) [2022] NSWCA 111 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 01 July 2022 Decision date: 01 July 2022 Before: Brereton JA Decision: Notice of motion filed on 22 December 2021 and amended on 4 May 2022 dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Court of Appeal – Application for stay of orders for payment of money out of court, pending application for special leave to appeal to High Court – Where leave to appeal against those payment orders and earlier orders refused by majority of this Court – Where similar application to present already refused for lack of prospect that special leave will be granted – Application for reconsideration under UCPR r 36.16 incompetent – No application made for review of previous decision nor suggestion that conclusion was incorrect – No change of circumstances since first decision identified – Stay not sought by only party potentially prejudiced by relevant orders – Application dismissed with costs Cases Cited: Jennings Construction Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (No 1) (1986) 161 CLR 681; [1986] HCA 84 Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 446 Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] NSWSC 381 Pham v Enterprise ICT Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 12 Sebie v Pham (No 3) [2021] NSWCA 277 Sebie v Pham (No 4) [2021] NSWCA 326 Sebie v Pham [2021] NSWCA 11 Sebie v Pham [2021] NSWCA 115 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Robert Sebie (First Applicant) Ronald Jemmott (Second Applicant) Andy Vuong Duc Pham (First Respondent) Thi Huong Giang Pham (Second Respondent) ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liq) (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate