NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Hasan (Costs) [2022] NSWCATOD 69 Hearing dates: 17 June 2022 Date of orders: 01 July 2022 Decision date: 01 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Le Poer Trench ADCJ, Principal Member Decision: The Respondent is to pay the Health Care Complaints Commission costs of the Stage Two hearing and the costs determination, such costs to be as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party — general rule that costs follow the event — determination of the costs order to be made in the Stage Two hearing Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ameisen v Medical Council of NSW [2015] NSWCATOD 49 Fryer v HCCC [2015] NSWCATOD 177 HCCC v Martin [2022] NSWCATOD 33 HCCC v Mohammadi (No. 2) [2022] NSWCATOD 15 Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307 Health Care Complaints Commission v Livermore [2021] NSWCATOD 115 [20] Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Ristevski v Medical Council of NSW [2016] NSWCATOD Sabah Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 306 Stena Rederi Aktiebolag v Austal Ships Sales Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1141 Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3) (1979) 28 ALR 201 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Costs Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Mahbub Hasan (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Hanna Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/00241421 Publication restriction: Pursuant to section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) an order is made prohibiting publication of the name of any person identified as a patient or former patient of the Respondent, the name of the nurse who is the subject of the Complaint made against the Respondent, or the name of the nurse's husband.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate