NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Gao [2022] NSWCATOD 73 Hearing dates: 13, 14, 16 December 2021 and 20 April 2022 Date of orders: 06 July 2022 Decision date: 06 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: I R Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member Dr G Yeo, Senior Member Dr J Fogarty, Senior Member D Telford, General Member Decision: 1. The Tribunal finds the Respondent guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct. 2. The Tribunal finds the Respondent guilty of professional misconduct. 3. The proceedings are adjourned to a date to be fixed for directions with respect to the hearing of Stage 2 of the proceedings. 4. The costs of the proceedings are reserved. Catchwords: HEALTH — professional registration and discipline —professional misconduct — whether practitioner breached doctor-patient boundaries — where practitioner relied on character evidence — whether unsatisfactory professional conduct of practitioner sufficiently serious to constitute professional misconduct Legislation Cited: Health Care Complaints Act 1993(NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation 2016 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: A v N [2012] NSWSC 354 Attwood v The Queen [1960] HCA 15; (1960) 102 CLR 353 Blatch v Archer (1774) 98 ER 969 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Campbell v Campbell [2015] NSWSC 784 Chen v Health Care Complaints Commission [2017] NSWCA 186 Eastman v R (1997) FCR 9 G v H [1994] HCA 48; (1994) 181 CLR 387 Hardcastle v Commissioner of Police (1984) 53 ARL 539 Health Care Complaints Commission v Amalakumar [2019] NSWCATOD 173 Health Care Complaints Commission v Grygiel (Termination Application) [2020] NSWCATOD 53 Health Care Complaints Commission v Little [2015] NSWCATOD 146 Health Care Complaints Commission v Ross [2019] NSWCATOD 153 Health Care Complaints Commission v Wilcox [2020] NSWCATOD 10 Health Care Complaints Commission v Yildirim [2021] NSWCATOD 146 Helton v Allan [1940] 63 CLR 691 Ho v Powell [2001] NSWCA 168; (2001) 51 NSWLR 572 Hobhouse v McArthur Onslow [2016] NSWSC 1831 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305: (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Medical Board of Australia v Gupta [2015] QCAT 20 Medical Board of Australia v Moschou [2021] SACAT 30 Melbourne v R [1999] HCA 32; (1999) 198 CLR 1 Melbourne v The Queen [1999] HCA 32; (1999) 198 CLR 1 New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Orr [2019] NSWCA 231 PGM v R (2006) 164 A Crim R 426 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales v Secretary of the Treasury [2014] NSWCA 112 R v Bartle [2003] NSWCCA 329 R v Byrnes & Hopwood [1995] HCA 1; (1995) 183 CLR 501 R v El-Kheir [2004] NSWCCA 461 R v Skaf [2004] NSWCCA 74 R v Stalder (1981) 2 NSWLR 9 Stirland v Director of Public Prosecutions [1944] AC 315 Sudath v Health Care complaints Commission [2012] NSWCA 34 TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46; (2002) 212 CLR 124 West v Mead [2003] NSWSC 161 Texts Cited: Sexual Boundaries: Guidelines for Doctors. Medical Court of Australia. October 2018 Sexual Boundaries: Guidelines for Doctors. Medical Court of Australia. October 2011 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Edward Rezhong Gao (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Stevens (Applicant) T Hammond (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate