NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DU v R [2022] NSWCCA 149 Hearing dates: 27 June 2022 Date of orders: 17 August 2022 Decision date: 17 August 2022 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL at [1] Garling J at [2] Wilson J at [72] Decision: See [71] Catchwords: SENTENCING — appeal against sentence — subjective considerations on sentence — special circumstances — failure to give effect to finding of special circumstances — error requiring resentencing SENTENCING — appeal against sentence —informers — sentence reduced because of assistance provided to law enforcement authorities SENTENCING — appeal against sentence — co‑offenders — disparity between sentences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 ss 33B, 35, 59, 86 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 9, 23 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Christian v R [2021] NSWCCA 300 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Greentree v R [2018] NSWCCA 227 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 LS v R [2020] NSWCCA 27 R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 R v XX [2017] NSWCCA 90; 266 A Crim R 132 TL v R [2017] NSWCCA 308 West v R [2017] NSWCCA 306 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Sentence Parties: DU (Appellant) The Queen Representation: Counsel: D Barrow (Appellant) C Curtis (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate