NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Van Gorp v Davy [2022] NSWCA 117 Hearing dates: 5 July 2022 Date of orders: 6 July 2022 Decision date: 06 July 2022 Before: Meagher JA, Basten AJA Decision: (1) Dismiss summons seeking leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss notice of motion filed 20 June 2022. (3) Order the applicant to pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – leave to appeal – standing – application to set aside consent orders in Court below – applicant not a party to proceedings below – right to bring own proceedings not a sufficient basis to attract a right of appeal Legislation Cited: Guardianship of Infants Act 1916 (NSW), ss 13, 17 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101(2)(e) Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 70 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 7.14, 36.15(1), 36.16, 51.4 Cases Cited: J v Lieschke (1987) 162 CLR 447; [1987] HCA 4 Twist v Randwick Municipal Council (1976) 136 CLR 106; [1976] HCA 58 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sean Cornelius Van Gorp (Applicant) James Ashleigh Davy (First Respondent) Kimberley Evans (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
D Parish (Respondents)
Solicitors:
Applicant in person Macphillamy's Lawyers (Respondents) File Number(s): 2022/32972 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Equity Division Citation: [2022] NSWSC 39 Date of Decision: 1 February 2022 Before: Ward CJ in Eq File Number(s): 2020/00081102
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate