NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd (ACN 101 491 703) v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2022] NSWCATAP 220 Hearing dates: 25 March 2022 Date of orders: 6 July 2022 Decision date: 06 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Armstrong J, President E Bishop, Senior Member Decision: 1. Leave to raise new argument on appeal refused. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES – payroll tax – assessment – exemption – review – appeals – Appeal Panel – questions of law Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2003 (NSW), ss 80(2)(b), 80(3), 81(2) Payroll Tax Act 2007 (NSW), s 32, s 35 Cases Cited: Bridges Financial Services Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2005) 222 ALR 599; [2005] NSWSC 788 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert (1996) 186 CLR 389 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Commissioner of State Revenue v Optical Superstore Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 524 Commissioner of State Revenue v The Optical Superstore [2019] VSCA 197; 110 ATR 551 D & D Tolhurst Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) (1997) ATC 2179 Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2014) 96 ATR 875; [2014] NSWCA 378 Homefront Nursing Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2019] NSWCATAD 145 Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority v D & D Natural Health Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 170 Levitch Design Associates Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Levco Unit Trust v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCATAD 215 O'Grady v Northern Queensland Company Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 356 Sharp Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd v Collector of Customs (1995) 59 FCR 6 Smith's Snackfood Co Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2013) 97 ATR 904; [2013] NSWCA 470 The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2018] VCAT 169 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) (1984) 158 CLR 447; [1985] HCA 28 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd (ACN 101 491 703) (Appellant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P R Glissan (Appellant) A Gerard (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate