NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cheng v Motor Yacht Sales Australia Pty Ltd t/as The Boutique Boat Company [2022] NSWCA 118 Hearing dates: 28 June 2022 Date of orders: 06 July 2022 Decision date: 06 July 2022 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Ward P at [34]; Basten AJA at [35] Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEALS – leave to appeal – principles governing – monetary threshold – whether application identified issue of principle, question of public importance or reasonably clear injustice – where Parliament intended that matters involving relatively small amounts in issue should not come before the Court of Appeal as of right – where there is need for proportionality between value of matter and costs of proceedings CIVIL PROCEDURE – Court of Appeal – leave to appeal – monetary threshold – whether application identified issue of principle, question of public importance or reasonably clear injustice – where Parliament intended that matters involving relatively small amounts in issue should not come before the Court of Appeal as of right – where there is need for proportionality between value of matter and costs of proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 60 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 101(2) Cases Cited: Banque Commerciale SA (en liq) v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279; [1990] HCA 11 Be Financial Pty Ltd as trustee for Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 Berry v Nicholls [2016] NSWCA 272 Burrows v Macpherson & Kelley Lawyers (Sydney) Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 148 Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd t/as Bennetts Green Bowl [1995] NSWCA 69 Condensing Vaporisers Aust Pty Ltd t/as RJ Tinker & Son v FDC Construction & Fitout Pty Ltd (No 2) (2014) 86 NSWLR 360; [2014] NSWCA 89 Daily Examiner Pty Ltd v Mundine; Brown v Mundine [2011] NSWCA 126 Fox v Wood (1981) 148 CLR 438; [1981] HCA 41 Gaynor v Attorney General for New South Wales (2020) 102 NSWLR 123; [2020] NSWCA 48 Gurr v Robinson (Court of Appeal (NSW), 10 February 1986, unrep) Jaycar Pty Limited v Lombardo [2011] NSWCA 284 M & L Watson Pty Ltd t/as BBR Designs v Rilsung Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 36 PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48 Ritson v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCA 106 Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Smith (2017) 95 NSWLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 The Age Company Ltd v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Jian Ling Cheng (Applicant) Motor Yacht Sales Australia Pty Ltd t/as The Boutique Boat Company (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate